tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post3489616540831797442..comments2008-10-23T14:51:37.272+02:00Julio Merinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08233346614736256024noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post-72750871492230081652008-10-23T14:51:00.000+02:002008-10-23T14:51:00.000+02:00There is a description how to run Boost.Process tests at http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/09/142546.php. It includes a small patch which needs to be applied to Boost.Tests to ignore SIGCHLD (it's only one line to change :). Unfortunately I don't know any other way to make Boost.Tests ignore SIGCHLD either. :-/ That way the tests can be run at least without wondering if Boost.Process is broken. <BR/><BR/>BorisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post-55183128834150742992008-10-23T08:42:00.000+02:002008-10-23T08:42:00.000+02:00Woohoo thats real good news however did you notice this recent post:<BR/>http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/09/142545.php<BR/><BR/>and here:<BR/>http://www.highscore.de/boost/process/<BR/><BR/>and here:<BR/>http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/09/142547.php<BR/><BR/>I am sure your input will be "very" valuable as the current versions are based on your SOC project.<BR/><BR/>Can you post to Boost-Dev ml and let know to avoid any duplicate work and/or communicate with Boris about your intentions.<BR/><BR/>I'd really like to see this library in Boost.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com