tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post1516449101255915935..comments2007-05-19T10:57:51.658+02:00Julio Merinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08233346614736256024noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post-61254361634317357832007-05-19T10:57:00.000+02:002007-05-19T10:57:00.000+02:00anonymous: I don't want to give up on Boost.Process; not yet. I have spent a lot of time in that project and I have interest in finishing it, learning all it takes to do so (which is the "hard" part) and going through the full review process. But I simply don't have the time to do it now...<BR/><BR/>However, people is very welcome to provide patches to the current code and ideas on how to attack the missing things (see the to-do list in the documentation, for example). That'd speed up development a bit, maybe :-)<BR/><BR/>In fact, I recently received a mail with some patches and I'll try to look at it this weekend.Julio M. Merino Vidalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08233346614736256024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post-58612127946023076942007-05-19T04:55:00.000+02:002007-05-19T04:55:00.000+02:00Hi,<BR/><BR/>do you want to offer someone else the chance to taking over your Boost.Process in the Boost mailing list. I am sure someone would be interested in developing it/maintaining it. I'd like to see it includeed in Boost 1.35Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post-60188478472555866042007-04-16T23:14:00.000+02:002007-04-16T23:14:00.000+02:00anonymous: I ran out of time after past summer to work on Boost.Process. However, it is something I really want to finish. I spent part of past week cleaning up some problems and doing a bit of work on it, which you can see in the SVN tree. I would like to see it integrated into Boost after all the time I spent on it, but it still requires a non-trivial amount of work to be ready.<BR/><BR/>I didn't consider reapplying for this project this year simply because I did not have this idea! Anyway, the automated testing framework for NetBSD is something else I really want to do and which I believe can greatly help the project; in fact, I presented a similar proposal past year.<BR/><BR/>Grr... so much things to do and so few time!<BR/><BR/>Peter: Thanks! :-) I hope to fulfill all the expectations.Julio M. Merino Vidalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08233346614736256024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post-30357486576125982502007-04-16T14:35:00.000+02:002007-04-16T14:35:00.000+02:00This is just excellent news! NetBSD is in real need of a regression test framework and I think you're just the guy to make it. I like the ideas on this you posted a while ago.<BR/><BR/>Good luck with the implementation!Peter Bexhttp://sjamaan.ath.cxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17885055.post-10321315097474354832007-04-15T05:44:00.000+02:002007-04-15T05:44:00.000+02:00Whatever happended to your Boost.Process SoC. I dont see it in the review pages for Boost at the moment.<BR/><BR/>Are you still actively working on it?<BR/><BR/>Are you going to complete it for a Boost review?<BR/><BR/>Why didn't you just re-elect yourself for Boost.Process again for Soc?<BR/><BR/>Please do so and dont abandon Boost.Process. I think it is such a good library that you should submit it for review to get it included in Boost.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com